Car Parking must be available for all

Consumer Panel Points To Deficient Service, Unfair Practice
In a 26-yearold battle for a parking slot, holding a Goregaon housing society guilty of deficiency in service for violating the “one member, one parking” rule, the state consumer commission directed it to cancel all allotments of car parking spaces that were “sold” or “allotted” by the builder and provide a slot to flat owners who were unfairly denied space for years.

“A society is welfare oriented body and has a statutory obligation to ensure that cornmon amenities like parking are distributed equitably Providing multiple slots to certain members while forcing others to park on the road leading to foreseeable risks and damages is the very definition of an inadequate and deficient service,” said the com mission.

The housing society, Dheeraj Valley Building No 3 CHS, was ordered to pay Rs 1 lakh as compensation for mental agony and Rs25,000 towards litigation costs to complainants KT Thomas and Sajita Thomas. “The opposite party is directéd to formulate a fresh parking policy within four months from the date of this order, strictly in accordance with Model Bye-laws… and allot one car parking space to the complainants on priority,” said the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on May 12.

The flat ownets were forced to park their car on the road outside the premises, where a tree subsequently fell on their four wheeler in 2016, causing significant damage. The commission observed that “deficiency in service is clearly established when a co-operative housing society fails to perform its fundamental duties as prescribed by its own byelaws and the settled law of the land”.

The complainants moved the commission in 2020 after the society management continuously failed to allocatea parking space. They submitted that as per their knowlede there are 60 car parking spaces, including open and stilt, in the society, and there are 96
flats in the society of which more than 30 do not have a single car. The dispute allegedly escalated when the society passed a resolution during an Annual General Meeting in Sep 2017, validating old parking allotments made by the original builder in perpetuity.

The residents contested this move, writing multiple letters to the management and the local deputy registrar. The society alleged that the complainants never made any oral or written request pmviding vehicle details for allotment of an open or
stilt parking space, and has not produced evidence of any such request. However, the commission noted that the society’s defence regarding the lack of a formal application is a mere technicality used to mask administrative negligence

An Appeal from Internet Freedom Foundation

Hello, sharing an earnest appeal from me to support Internet Freedom Foundation work. Today IFF has launched it’s Annual Membership Drive and is aiming at an ambitious target (not really big when you consider how many people in India benefit from digital rights) of signing up 800 Indians who donate 600 rupees each month.

Please do donate, or even share this post (or sent a WhatsApp message on your school or college alumni group, we have a template on the AMD link below). Each like, comment and share matters to help sustain our work and for IFF to have a semblance of financial stability.

Annual Membership Drive (AMD) : https://internetfreedom.in/to-fight-the-good-fight-with-courage-and-skill-iff-needs-800-members/
Donate Link: https://internetfreedom.in/donate/

Help IFF fight the good fight. We promise to do it with skill, honesty and heart.

Are you 60+ or helping parents or senior citizens use digital payments?

The Reserve Bank of India has proposed new safeguards to reduce fraud—such as:

  • A possible delay in certain transactions
  • Extra checks for senior citizens
  • A “kill switch” to block payments instantly

While these aim to improve safety, they may also affect how quickly and easily payments can be made.

We want your views—this short survey takes just 3 minutes: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/mlf-survey

Your feedback will help Moneylife Foundation prepare a public response to the RBI.

Please fill this survey and share it too. It is important feedback to make a proper representation to the RBI. It impacts all of us. 🙏

Practical Handbook for Housing Societies

Most housing society disputes are avoidable.

The Practical Handbook for Housing Societies by Moneylife Foundation offers clear, practical guidance based on real-life cases and years of experience.

It covers key issues such as:

  • Elections and governance
  • Maintenance disputes and charges
  • Redevelopment and conveyance
  • Accounting transparency and member rights

Limited print copies available. One complimentary copy is being given to members of Moneylife Foundation and any additional copies at the printing cost of ₹100 each (subject to availability).

Become a FREE member of Moneylife Foundation: https://www.mlfoundation.in/register.html

FIR for extortion if Housing Societies charge for OCs


Senior BJP leader, advocate Vivekanand Gupta, flagged the illegal practice; said the charges will be nominal and will have to be paid directly to BMC

Senior BJP leader, advocate Vivekanand Gupta, has warned that FIRs for extortion will be filed against office-bearers of cooperative housing societies who are charging exorbitant monies from members under the pretext of obtaining occupation certificates

Gupta was on the committee appointed by the state government to suggest a policy for granting OCs to buildings. He said the policy for getting OCs will have to be approved by the standing and improvement committees of the BMC and only then applications for the same can be made. These panels are yet to be formed, and the application procedure will be published in due
course.


Gupta said only the official fee for the same needs to be paid by members of cooperative societies. He said no agents have been appointed for getting the OCs, adding that the BJP was committed to helping thousands of Mumbaikars in a transparent manner.
Advocate Gupta said that managing should not collect any money towards issuance of OCs. He said the charges will be nominal and will have to be paid directly to the BMC. He added that FIRs for extortion will be filed against all those who collect
from members ostensibly for obtaining OCs through agents.

Chairman of Maharashtra Welfare Association said payment to the BMC for an OC will have to be done only online and
no cash payment will be involved.


This being the case, members should not pay money to any “agent”, Advocate Gupta warned. He said any money collected
over and above the official charge will be illegal. A society in Goregaon has collected Rs75,000 from each member for getting the OC. An activist said the money should be refunded immediately or else an FIR for extortion can be filed at the police station concerned against the office-bearers.

  • Free Press Journal

The Delhi High Court ruled that a sister relinquishing her property rights in favor of her brother is not a gift

The Delhi High Court ruled that a sister relinquishing her property rights in favor of her brother is not a gift, but a family settlement among co-owners.

In the landmark case Ramesh Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi), decided on 8 October 2025, the Delhi High Court clarified that when legal heirs relinquish their rights in inherited property in favor of another co-owner, such a transaction is not a gift under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and therefore does not attract gift-related stamp duty.

🔍 Key Highlights from the Judgment

  • Case Title: Ramesh Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
  • Citation: LPA No. 346 of 2020
  • Bench: Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
  • Date of Decision: 8 October 2025
  • Court: Delhi High Court

🧾 Legal Interpretation

  • Relinquishment ≠ Gift: The court held that a relinquishment deed executed by sisters in favor of their brother, who was also a co-owner, is not a gratuitous transfer. It is a release of rights in a jointly inherited property.
  • Stamp Duty Implication: Since the deed does not constitute a gift, it is not liable for stamp duty under the gift provisions of the Indian Stamp Act.
  • Nature of Transaction: T

NOC not required from Registrar for Redevelopment – Bandra Nisha Co-op Soc.

Key Facts

  1. No Court-Approval Needed for Redevelopment
    The court clarified that the District Deputy Registrar (DDR) has no legal authority under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act to require or provide a “No Objection” for a housing society’s redevelopment.
    The General Body of the society holds the authority to make this decision.
  2. Role of the General Body
    Only the General Body can approve redevelopment, following the society’s bye-laws and relevant Government Resolutions.
    A majority-approved decision is legally binding.
  3. Registrar’s Role is Supervisory
    The DDR’s role is only to supervise, not to interfere or control. They cannot mandate a “No Objection,” nor can they block a redevelopment approved by the society.
  4. Challenge Mechanisms
    If a member believes the process is unfair, they must approach a Cooperative Court for redressal.
    The absence of a “No Objection” does not invalidate a decision made through proper procedure.

Practical Steps for Societies

  • Ensure an Authorized Officer is present at meetings for developer selection.
  • Maintain detailed records (minutes, attendance, approvals).
  • Follow documented procedures to strengthen legitimacy.

Directions to Registrars

  • Stop requiring “No Objection” certificates for redevelopment.
  • Strictly limit their role to oversight and ensuring transparency.
  • Reinforced by court order—compliance and no interference.

Bottom Line

This ruling protects the autonomy of housing societies in redevelopment decisions, clearly stating that registrars cannot veto or control these processes. The focus is now on transparency, proper procedure, and majority-based decision-making within the society itself.